Baghel Dismisses ED Summons Reports
Former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel has refuted reports that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued summons to his son in an ongoing investigation. Calling it a case of media hype, Baghel accused the probe agency of using the media to create unnecessary speculation and political pressure.
Baghel’s remarks come amid an ongoing probe by the ED into alleged financial irregularities linked to coal and liquor scams in the state. The former CM has consistently maintained that the cases against his associates are politically motivated, designed to target opposition leaders ahead of key political events.
ED Investigation and Political Reactions
The Enforcement Directorate has been actively investigating various corruption cases in Chhattisgarh, particularly involving alleged scams during Baghel’s tenure as CM. Reports surfaced claiming that the agency had summoned Baghel’s son for questioning, but Baghel has dismissed these claims, stating that no such notice was received.
Political tensions have escalated following these allegations. The Congress has accused the ruling BJP of misusing central agencies to harass opposition leaders, while the BJP maintains that the investigations are legitimate and aimed at uncovering corruption. The ED, however, has not made any official statement confirming the summons.
Allegations of Political Vendetta
Bhupesh Baghel has been vocal about what he calls the BJP-led government’s strategy of targeting opposition leaders through investigative agencies. He argues that similar tactics have been used in other states where opposition parties are in power or hold significant influence.
He further claimed that the ED’s alleged move to summon his son is part of a broader attempt to damage his political reputation. This is not the first time Baghel has accused central agencies of working under political influence, as he had previously raised concerns about the timing of raids and investigations against his party members.
What Lies Ahead?
With no official confirmation from the ED about the summons, the controversy remains largely political. Whether Baghel’s son will actually be called for questioning or whether this is a case of media speculation remains to be seen.
As political battles intensify in Chhattisgarh, the issue of ED investigations is likely to remain a key talking point. The opposition continues to challenge the credibility of these probes, while the government insists they are part of a legitimate crackdown on corruption. Regardless of the outcome, the case has added another layer of complexity to the state’s political landscape.
