Introduction: A Border Dispute Reignited
The long-standing Katchatheevu island issue has once again found itself at the center of political discourse in India. Triggered by Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin’s renewed request to the central government for action on the island, the debate has now drawn cross-party support. Congress MP Pramod Tiwari recently echoed the sentiments of Stalin, urging Prime Minister Narendra Modi to raise the issue “firmly” on international platforms.
The Katchatheevu controversy, rooted in maritime boundaries and fishermen’s rights, is not new. However, its resurgence in national politics—particularly with bipartisan voices like that of Tiwari and Stalin—has breathed new urgency into a matter that has implications for foreign policy, regional politics, and coastal livelihoods.
Historical Background: Understanding the Katchatheevu Island Issue
The Katchatheevu island issue dates back to 1974, when India ceded the small, uninhabited island of Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka under a bilateral agreement. Located in the Palk Strait between Tamil Nadu and northern Sri Lanka, the island was traditionally used by Indian fishermen and also served as a pilgrimage site due to the presence of St. Anthony’s Church.
The decision to hand over the island, taken during Indira Gandhi’s tenure as Prime Minister, has remained controversial. Critics argue that it was done without parliamentary approval and that it continues to harm the livelihood of Indian fishermen, who face arrests and harassment by Sri Lankan authorities when they venture near the island.
The Katchatheevu island political debate has often been reignited during election cycles or following major incidents involving Indian fishermen. However, Stalin’s recent approach and Tiwari’s endorsement indicate a strategic consensus forming around the idea that the time has come for India to renegotiate or review the status of Katchatheevu.
Stalin’s Letter and Tiwari’s Response: A Bipartisan Stand
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin recently wrote to Prime Minister Modi, urging him to reopen discussions with Sri Lanka on the Katchatheevu issue, emphasizing the hardships faced by Tamil Nadu’s fishermen. Stalin argued that the continued arrests of Indian fishermen for crossing invisible maritime boundaries were unacceptable and that retrieving Katchatheevu—or at least ensuring unhindered access—was critical.
Congress MP Pramod Tiwari publicly supported Stalin’s stance, stating that the central government must take the issue seriously. “The Prime Minister must raise the Katchatheevu island issue firmly with Sri Lanka and at international forums,” Tiwari said, adding that political lines should not divide matters of national and humanitarian interest.
This growing consensus on the Katchatheevu territorial dispute showcases how regional concerns can evolve into national priorities when articulated strategically and supported by multiple political voices.
Strategic and Diplomatic Concerns
Raising the Katchatheevu island issue in international diplomacy is easier said than done. Since the island was officially ceded in 1974 and reaffirmed in 1976 through a maritime boundary agreement, Sri Lanka holds sovereign rights over it. Any renegotiation would require reopening these treaties—an action that could strain Indo-Sri Lankan relations.
Moreover, India must tread carefully considering China’s growing presence in Sri Lanka through economic investments and port projects. India’s assertion on Katchatheevu must be weighed against larger strategic interests in the Indian Ocean Region.
However, voices like Tiwari’s suggest that the Katchatheevu island dispute is not solely a matter of sovereignty—it is a humanitarian issue impacting thousands of families dependent on fishing. Framing the issue through the lens of human rights and traditional rights, rather than territorial claims alone, could be a more viable diplomatic approach.
The Human Cost: Fishermen in the Crossfire
One of the most pressing concerns related to the Katchatheevu island issue is the plight of Indian fishermen. For decades, fishermen from Tamil Nadu have relied on the waters around Katchatheevu for their livelihood. The island, once considered a shared space, has now become a restricted zone, heavily patrolled by the Sri Lankan Navy.
Fishermen inadvertently crossing the maritime boundary are often arrested, their boats confiscated, and legal proceedings initiated. These incidents cause economic distress and social trauma for entire communities. Families struggle to recover impounded boats, many of which are never returned.
The human cost of this dispute cannot be overstated. Tiwari’s support of Stalin’s request brings this humanitarian angle into national focus, highlighting that Katchatheevu is more than a piece of land—it’s a matter of livelihood and dignity for countless Indian citizens.
Legal and Constitutional Considerations
The Katchatheevu cession of 1974 remains legally ambiguous. Several legal experts and political leaders have questioned whether Parliament was adequately informed and whether the transfer followed constitutional procedures.
In the past, petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court of India, arguing that the agreement violated Article 253 of the Constitution, which requires parliamentary approval for international treaties that affect Indian territory. The courts, however, have often deemed the issue to fall within the domain of the executive.
Now, with renewed political backing and public interest, calls for a judicial review of the Katchatheevu agreement are growing. Tiwari’s remarks may pave the way for more MPs to raise the matter in Parliament and demand clarity on constitutional grounds.
Katchatheevu and Regional Sentiment in Tamil Nadu
The Katchatheevu island issue in Tamil Nadu politics has long been a rallying point. DMK, AIADMK, and other regional parties have repeatedly raised the matter, especially during elections or after maritime incidents involving fishermen. Stalin’s recent letter is consistent with his party’s long-standing demand to reclaim Indian access to Katchatheevu.
However, the difference this time lies in the national traction the issue is receiving. With Congress leaders like Tiwari voicing support and opposition parties signaling concern, the narrative may shift from being a regional matter to a national priority.
Moreover, for Tamil Nadu’s political landscape, asserting control or at least unhindered fishing rights near Katchatheevu is an emotional and cultural issue—deeply connected to Tamil identity and maritime traditions.
Can PM Modi Intervene?
As pressure mounts, the spotlight turns to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. While foreign policy remains a sensitive and strategic area, the growing voices from Tamil Nadu and national leaders like Tiwari could push the central government to reassess its position on Katchatheevu.
PM Modi’s government has, in the past, taken strong stances on issues involving Indian sovereignty and fishermen’s welfare. Whether he will take this matter to bilateral dialogues with Sri Lanka or bring it up on international platforms remains to be seen.
Nonetheless, with bipartisan pressure building, Modi may be compelled to at least open discussions or initiate a high-level review of India’s maritime policies and the 1974 agreement.
Alternative Solutions and the Way Forward
While reclaiming Katchatheevu island from Sri Lanka may not be immediately feasible due to diplomatic complexities, alternative solutions could be pursued:
- Joint patrol agreements between India and Sri Lanka to protect fishermen.
- Special fishing access zones negotiated through a fresh maritime protocol.
- Compensation and rehabilitation schemes for fishermen arrested or affected.
- Revisiting the legality of the 1974 and 1976 agreements in Parliament.
These measures, if pursued collectively by the Union and Tamil Nadu governments, could reduce tension, protect livelihoods, and uphold India’s regional interests without straining bilateral relations.
The current debate provides an opportunity to reimagine the Katchatheevu issue as a rights-based negotiation rather than a territorial tug-of-war.
Conclusion: A Moment for National Unity and Diplomatic Balance
The Katchatheevu island issue, revived through the strong intervention of Tamil Nadu’s Chief Minister M.K. Stalin and supported vocally by Congress MP Pramod Tiwari, has once again become a litmus test for India’s political and diplomatic will.
It is not just about a piece of land in the Palk Strait. It is about the Indian fishermen who venture into treacherous waters to feed their families. It is about India’s constitutional protocols and foreign policy priorities. And most importantly, it is about recognizing when regional pain must be acknowledged as a national cause.
As more voices rise in favor of revisiting the issue, the onus is now on the central government—led by PM Modi—to act. Whether through firm diplomatic channels, humanitarian interventions, or legal reviews, a robust and sensitive response is warranted.
The Katchatheevu island dispute has lingered long enough. With leaders across party lines now raising their voices, the time may finally be ripe for India to address this legacy issue with wisdom, unity, and resolve.
For News Update –Dailynewfeeds
